I may have more to say about Cap and Trade but Palin's Cap and Tax hit needs only a check of her accounting.
Maybe I won't, but I will be back on sabbatical. Meanwhile I leave with this segment of an email exchange:(slightly adapted)
I should have been reading this but maybe not.
I think I will agree with much of it, but I think my last email covered the change problem. But don't worry. I do not think that capitalism will be destroyed, and socialism is just a boogie cognomen. Just how do you think it would work if we could find anyone that could fix the economy who had not been a part of creating it? I don't know if Obama has the right people but others could be standing in the way of potentially right or left people. I mean if the complaint as O'Reilly put it is that somebody will make billions, well duh. Doesn't that support the system? Well not the system, but as most conservatives argue for it.
2 comments:
There is the thread of tax victimization and denial here rather than support for a system that promotes investment rather than...
well there is alway that. Change not progress.
In the "..." I refused to set up a contrast, and settle for a more dynamic dependence. Change is dependable: quantity and quality of existence, not.
Post a Comment